Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ASSOCIATES (PVT.) LIMITED versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN

The contempt of court Act 1976, section 3 of Pakistan (1973), petition against the respondents under Article 204 section 3, in compliance with the orders of the High Court under the contempt of court Act, 1976 and for contempt of court. On the one hand, under the orders of the High Court, the applicants were claimed to be leased for 99 years of land under the claim, and on the other hand they claimed that they were seeking, citing compliance with the decision. They are the owners of the land. After paying the price for the question, regular acquisition proceedings, the respondents being auction buyers, the Magistrate, Revenue Officer, Patwari Circle and local police took possession of the land in the presence of the magistrate and in the daily walkie. This report was added. The facts of the possession of the respondent (auction buyer) on the ground in question were in the knowledge of the applicants when they filed the review petition, the petition was also available to the applicants in the constitutional application. And such a request was not made by them. The petition stated that it had been prevented from taking it to the stage of pleading in the latest constitutional petition, even though such application was taken and contested, the applicants have no access to the respondents. There was no case to prosecute. The contempt of court declared that the orders passed in the relevant constitutional petition were effective and there was no reason for the applicants to challenge the same proportion referred to the respondents in December 1987 and the applicants had no objection thereafter. , Not just this time out advocates from Noor kot lawyer