SYED IMDAD HUSSAIN SHAH NAQVI versus REHMAT KHAN VARDAG
About 13 months after filing a claim between the parties, the application for the return of the Section 13 court fee was settled, since the matter was settled between the parties and no such matter was settled, so they were entitled to return. Were entitled to court fees, and because the case was filed in the month of January, 2010 and was dealt with in March 2010, the court only used two months, accordingly. The plaintiff was entitled to return the judicial fee was filed on 25 10 10 2010, then the notice and summons were issued on 27 10 2010. The NIT report was returned with the confirmation that one of the defendants had refused to receive the notice and a warrant was issued on the same guaranteed 27 10 2010. On 29 29 2010 the plaintiff was able to obtain an order which The court directed the judicial magistrate to seize containers belonging to the plaintiff, the IC was allegedly retained illegally by the defendants and the inventory was prepared and the said containers were placed in the court premises. On 8 8, 2010 it was ordered that the defendants have written to the plaintiff within four days with the advance copy and reply. Attachment can enter letters. The plaintiff may again file a copy of the entertainment document, after which the matter has been adjourned and the plaintiff moved an urgent application on 29 29 2010, and the matter was subsequently heard on three subsequent dates, The settlement was concluded, which was presented in the 2010 2010 Decree of the Court. Spend your valuable time investigating the matter, listening to the arguments and pondering
criminal advocate from Sakrand lawyer
